Malinda dee sentenced to 13 years in prison
Defendants of fraud and money laundering involved worth Rp27 billion and two million dollars or a total of Rp40 billion, Malinda Dee demanded 13 years imprisonment and a fine of Rp 10 billion or subsidiary seven months in prison."Punishing the defendant Malinda for 13 years in prison and a fine of Rp 10 billion and subsidiary seven months in prison," said the prosecutor, Tatang Sutarna in South Jakarta District Court on Thursday.Mentioned, Malinda Dee proven legally and convincingly proven violating the first and second charges.It is damning of the defendant's actions, said the prosecutor, the defendant has enjoyed the action and convoluted complicate the trial."The relief has not been convicted, courteous, and have dependents," he said.Defendant as a Citigold Executive has 203 customers and it is responsible and the defendant has a blank form and fill out entry on the grounds of convenience, and asking for autographs and then used as if on behalf of customers."In fact, for the benefit of the defendant himself. Then taken to the 'teller' and there was penstraferan," he explained.In fact, the fact the act was not on the orders of customers, and the defendant to transfer the money into his brother's account, Visca.Earlier in the indictment, the prosecutor considers Malinda on 27 January 2007-7 February 2011 to unauthorized or fraudulent transfers with no known or authorized by the customer concerned with giving a false transfer forms on behalf of 30 clients that he mastered.Then, he gave to "teller" bank Citibank, and was then sent to an individual or company's account that he had appointed as many as 117 times the transaction.Among the clients are harmed by the actions of bin Pateni Rohimin Malinda eg 24 times the transaction, N. Susetyo SUTAJI nine times the transaction and Suryati T. Budiman as much as six times the transaction.For the action, Malinda was charged with the Banking Law Article 49 Paragraph (1) Letter a Law No. 7/1992 as amended by Act no. 10/1998 on Banking in conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph (1) to-1 in conjunction with Article 65 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, Article 49 Paragraph subsidiary (2) Point b.The second indictment related to money laundering, which is considered Malinda to transfer assets that should be assumed as a result of the crime and to financial services companies to hide the criminal origins.By the prosecutor, Louth women born July 5, 1952 was a breach of Article 3 Paragraph (1) Letter b Law. 15/2002 as amended by Act no. 25/2003 as amended by Act no. 8/2010 on Money Laundering in conjunction with Article 65 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.
No comments:
Post a Comment